Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Samples

Dissenting opinion by

Chief Justice LAMBERT.

For the reasons articulated in my dissenting opinion in Krahwinkel v. Commonwealth Aluminum Corp.,11 dissent in this case. I cannot endorse the proposition that a wrongdoer or one who stands in the shoes of the wrongdoer should be rewarded, to the detriment of an innocent victim.

. 183 S.W.3d 154 (Ky.2005).