State v. Zimmerman

McDEVITT, Justice,

concurring and dissenting:

The Court succinctly and with elan sets forth the evidentiary issues raised. The Court wisely and correctly rules on those evidentiary issues. I concur in Parts II and III of the Court’s opinion.

I cannot, however, concur in the Court’s conclusion in Part I that there was a “reasonable possibility” that the evidence introduced in error could have contributed to the conviction in this case.