Commonwealth v. Matos

JOHNSON, Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent to the Majority’s disposition of the present case. Relying on the reasoning presented in the Dissenting Opinion in Commonwealth v. Carroll, — Pa.Super.-, 628 A.2d 398 (1993), I would affirm the trial court’s *45suppression of the contraband seized by police in the present case.

McEWEN, DEL SOLE and BECK, JJ., join.