dissents because he believes that the trial judge failed to adequately explain the perils of proceeding pro se as required by Wilson v. Commonwealth, 836 S.W.2d 872, 881-84 (Ky.1992), and Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975).