concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in the majority’s holding that evidence of unadjudicated offenses was improperly admitted during the punishment *265phase of the trial and that, for this reason, the judgment fixing punishment must be reversed.
However, for the reasons I have previously detailed, I believe that the judgment of conviction should be reversed and the entire cause remanded for a new trial. See Murdock v. State, 840 S.W.2d 558 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1992), vacated, 845 S.W.2d 915 (Tex.Crim.App.1993). To the extent that we affirm the judgment of conviction, I dissent.