ON appellant’s motion for rehearing
McDonald, judge.Appellant takes us to task for not mentioning, in our original opinion, his contention that the trial judge committed re*183versible error in making comments upon the weight of the evidence.
He raises this contention by formal and informal bills of exception.
Presiding Judge Woodley, in the opinion of February 7, 1962, held, and set forth the reasons as to why, the formal bills presented nothing for review. With that holding we still adhere.
The informal bill has been examined and we find no reversible error therein.
Appellant reurges certain points of error that were answered in our original opinion and we do not deem it necessary to discuss them further.
Remaining contentions of appellant are overruled and the motion for rehearing is denied.