Honeymead Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Knutson, Chief Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent. It is clear from the comments of the committee drafting the 1963 code that there was no intention of changing existing law as to postjudgment orders. I do not know how the language could have been made more clear nor do I see any necessity for reading ambiguity into it,

Mr. Justice Sheran took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.