McKeown v. Calusa

*10CONCURRING OPINION

Staton, P. J.

I concur. The trial court’s error in sustaining the motion for judgment on the evidence was harmless in light of the jury’s verdict. The instruction appears to have been in the light of the evidence, a needless instruction, but it does not constitute reversible error. McKeown has not demonstrated how he was prejudiced by the giving of the instruction.

Note. — Reported at 359 N.E.2d 550.