concurring.
I concur. The evidence established that Edwards’ determination to kill Officer Ener endangered Officer Ener even though he did not see the weapon. Officer Anderson saw the weapon as a source of danger, a threat, to Officer Ener and responded to remove the threat. That Edwards acted surreptitiously to hide the *682threat simply made his behavior more dangerous, more threatening, not less so. I agree with the affirmance of the conviction.