Weinstein v. Weinstein

AMY, J.,

concurring in part, dissenting in part.

|tI respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority opinion reversing the trial court’s determination that the August 7, 1997 order purportedly establishing a community property regime was invalid. It is clear that the parties failed to satisfy the requirements necessary to create a matrimonial agreement pursuant to La.Civ.Code art. 2331. In my opinion, |2the deficient attempt to create a community property regime was a nullity. Therefore, I would affirm the trial court’s decision in this regard.

In all other aspects of the opinion, I concur in the majority’s decision.