Remington Rand, Inc. v. Sugarland-Industries

On Motion for Rehearing.

After reconsideration, this court finds no substantial error in its former disposition, hence that will be adhered to. If it be true, as plaintiff in error contends, that by mistake or miscalculation judgment was rendered that plaintiff in error take nothing when $20.67 was due them, while the matter is de minimis here, the trial court may correct such miscalculation pursuant to R. S.'Article 2229.

Motion for rehearing is refused.

Opinion adopted by the Court.