On Motion for Eehearing.
Appellants misapprehend in toto the holding of this court., We .have passed upon no question of law concerning the merits of the controversy between the parties. We quoted the findings of the trial court to show there was no reason why the writ should not issue to stay proceedings until the pending matters could be disposed of. Nothing else was passed upon, except the sole question of the propriety, under the circumstances, of the .court’s well-considered judgment in granting the stay.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.