On Motion for Rehearing.
We have carefully considered appellants’ motion for a rehearing, and are of the opinion that the same should be overruled and it has been so ordered.
In our opinion filed herein we say in discussing the assignment of error complaining of certain remarks made by appellees’ counsel in the concluding argument that “we cannot say in view of the entire record that such remarks were prejudicial to appellants, or that they in any wise influenced the jury either in returning a verdict for the plaintiffs, or in fixing the amount of their award.” The conclusion we reached in deciding the ease was that such remarks in our opinion were not prejudicial to defendants, and did not in any wise influence the jury either to return a verdict for the plaintiffs or in fixing the amount of their award, and we now so hold.