UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7019
LEO L. MADDOX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID ODOM, Hearing Officer; MARIA BLANDSHAW,
I.A.C. Staff Coordinator, in their official
and individual capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-94-1835-3-18BC)
Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leo L. Maddox, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Arlen Cotter, Jr., Benjamin
Davis McCoy, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, GRIER & HOWSER, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re-
lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate
judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maddox v. Odom,
No. CA-94-1835-3-18BC (D.S.C. June 13, 1995). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2