UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7466
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MARCELO MORIZ-HENRIQUEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District
Judge. (CR-93-92-A, CA-95-401-AM)
Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcelo Moriz-Henriquez, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
post-judgment motion for enlargement of time to file additional
pleadings in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) action. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. The motion, which essentially sought reconsideration under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), presented no exceptional circumstances
warranting relief. See Dowell v. State Fire & Cas. Auto Ins. Co.,
993 F.2d 46, 48 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Moriz-Henriquez,
Nos. CR-93-92-A; CA-95-401-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 25, 1995). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2