UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2565
PRENTISS MURRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GALEY & LORD, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-94-2115-4-21-JI)
Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Prentiss Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Allan Lash Shackelford, SMITH,
HELMS, MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
his employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-2 (West 1994).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Murray v. Galey & Lord, Inc., No. CA-94-
2115-4-21-JI (D.S.C. July 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
AFFIRMED
2