UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-3071
JERRY L. GENT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CENTRAL VIRGINIA LEGAL AID SOCIETY,
INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-95-764)
No. 95-7857
JERRY L. GENT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CLIENT CENTERED LEGAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-95-1188-R)
Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry L. Gent, Appellant Pro Se. John William Boland, Martha Saine
Condyles, Andrew Eric Kauders, Jr., MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE &
BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district courts' orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and dismissing a
civil complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the
records and the district courts' opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
courts. Gent v. Central VA Legal Aid, No. CA-95-764 (E.D. Va. Nov.
15, 1995); Gent v. Client Centered Legal Servs., No. CA-95-118-R
(W.D. Va. Nov. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3