UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2449
FRANK EVANS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RIVER RIDERS, INCORPORATED, a West Virginia
Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MARK GRIMES, President/owner, River Riders,
Incorporated; PETER LIGOCKI, a/k/a Carp,
Defendants.
No. 95-2558
FRANK EVANS,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RIVER RIDERS, INCORPORATED, a West Virginia
Corporation; MARK GRIMES, President/owner,
River Riders, Incorporated; PETER LIGOCKI,
a/k/a Carp,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CA-93-31-3)
Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
No. 95-2449 affirmed and No. 95-2558 dismissed by unpublished per
curiam opinion.
Frank Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Anita Rose Casey, MEYER, DARRAGH,
BUCKLER, BEBENEK & ECK, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
In Appeal No. 95-2449, Appellant appeals from the district
court's order dismissing his personal injury action. We have
reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Evans v. River Riders, Inc., No. CA-93-31-3 (N.D.W.
Va. June 21, 1995). We further deny Appellant's motion to stay the
action and Appellee's motion to dismiss the action.
In Appeal No. 95-2558, the Appellants, Defendants below, noted
this appeal outside the time period established by Fed. R. App. P.
4(a)(3), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period and are
not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time
periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and juris-
dictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S.
257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,
229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on June 21, 1995;
Evans noted his appeal on July 20, 1995. Appellants' notice of
appeal was filed on August 15, 1995. Under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(3),
the Appellants had fourteen days from the date Evans noted his
appeal to note their appeal. Appellants' failure to note a timely
appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this
court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss
the appeal.
3
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
No. 95-2449 - AFFIRMED
No. 95-2558 - DISMISSED
4