UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
No. 95-7675
D. MARSHALL, W.S.P.D.; C. J.
WARREN, W.S.P.D.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem.
N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-90-606-6)
Submitted: January 18, 1996
Decided: February 12, 1996
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and
CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
_________________________________________________________________
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Judge Luttig wrote a
concurring opinion.
_________________________________________________________________
COUNSEL
Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Pierce Egerton,
Dewey Wallace Wells, Ursula Marie Henninger, WOMBLE, CAR-
LYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c).
_________________________________________________________________
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v.
Marshall, No. CA-90-606-6 (M.D.N.C. July 19, 1991 & Oct. 6,
1995). We deny Appellant's motion to disqualify three judges of this
court because he has not established bias or prejudice. 28 U.S.C.
§ 455 (1988). We deny Appellant's motion for production of docu-
ments and a transcript and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, concurring:
Appellant has filed 123 appeals in this court between October 22,
1993, and today. I would impose sanctions against Appellant for
abuse of the judicial process.
2