Filed: February 12, 1996
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7337
(CA-95-2089-WM)
David Wayne Hall, Sr.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
State of Maryland,
Respondent - Appellee.
O R D E R
The Court amends its opinion filed January 17, 1996, as
follows:
On the cover sheet, section 5 -- the panel information is
corrected to read "Before Ervin, Chief Judge, and Widener and
Wilkins, Circuit Judges."
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Bert M. Montague
Clerk
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7337
DAVID WAYNE HALL, SR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF MARYLAND,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-95-2089-WMN)
Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Wayne Hall, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismiss-
ing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have
reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable
cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. Hall v. State of Maryland, No. CA-95-2089-WMN (D.
Md. July 25, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for production of
documents and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3