UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7698
JOHN PRICE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Officers; MEDICAL
DEPARTMENT; OFFICERS OF GREENSVILLE CORREC-
TIONAL CENTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District
Judge. (CA-92-1560-AM, CA-93-13-AM, CA-93-14-AM, CA-93-15-AM, CA-
93-16-AM)
Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: March 19, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Price, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Price v. Department of Corrections, Nos. CA-92-1560-AM; CA-
93-13-AM; CA-93-14-AM; CA-93-15-AM; CA-93-16-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 28,
1994). We modify the district court's order to one of dismissal be-
cause the unexecuted affidavits on which the district court relied
were insufficient to support any findings. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56
(required form of affidavits). Further, the record does not support
the district court's statement that Appellant was given the notice
required by Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2