UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8517
DAVID MAURICE BEATTY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR LINCOLN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge; Wallace Wade Dixon, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-983)
Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Maurice Beatty, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and a magistrate judge's
order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have
reviewed the record and the opinions and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and
magistrate judge. Beatty v. Lincoln, No. CA-95-983 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 4
& 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2