UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-1062
BRUCE E. ANDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID L. SMITH; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF COR-
RECTIONS; DR. CEI; DR. KAPIL; EDWARD CAREY,
Doctor; DR. AMMONETTE; E. C. MORRIS; DOCTOR
WALKER, Bland Correctional Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District
Judge; Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge. (CA-93-582-R)
Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 22, 1996
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce E. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Christine Maggard,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia;
Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Anderson v. Smith, No. CA-93-582-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 8, 1994).
We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2