UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6230
CLYDE WALTER MEADOWS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner; WILLIAM SMITH;
LIEUTENANT ROULING; OFFICER EVANS; OFFICER
HARSH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95-
1779-AMD)
Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 3, 1996
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clyde Walter Meadows, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GEN-
ERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Meadows v. Lanham, No. CA-95-1779-AMD (D. Md. Jan. 30,
1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2