UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-3097
HOWARD J. MCCLURE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Carl Horn, III, Chief
Magistrate Judge. (CA-95-203-3-H)
Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 24, 1996
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Howard J. McClure, Appellant Pro Se. Craig A. Reutlinger, VAN HOY,
REUTLINGER & TAYLOR, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from a magistrate judge's order denying his
motion for appointment of counsel and assessing him costs and at-
torney's fees for a deposition he failed to attend. We dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appeal-
able. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here
appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We also deny Appel-
lant's motions for production of documents, for appointment of
counsel, to expedite the appeal,* and for fair trial and inter-
racial jury. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
*
The decision in this appeal having been made, this motion is
moot and is denied for that reason.
2