UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6030
HAROLD O. HILL, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SHERWOOD R. MCCABE; S. L. MELVIN; JOHN V.
WELLONS; JAMES B. FRENCH; JAMES SMITH, Doctor,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 96-6075
HAROLD ORLANDO HILL, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EARL BUTLER; DAN FORD; ED GRANNIS; CUMBERLAND
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JOHN DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
Judge; Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-849-F, CA-95-955-
5-CT-H)
Submitted: May 14, 1996 Decided: May 24, 1996
2
Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold O. Hill, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing
two 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the rec-
ords and the district court's opinions regarding these claims and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissals on
the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. McCabe, No. CA-95-849-
F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 1995); Hill v. Butler, No. CA-95-955-5-CT-H
(E.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 1996). We modify the orders to reflect that the
dismissals are without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1988). We deny
Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
3
4