UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2601
MICHAEL J. BIONDO; DANIE O. GILLESPIE; JAMES
SHAW; HASKELL R. BROWN, JR.,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
JUNIA E. MOTT; JOHN B. MURRAY; LINDSAY K.
NELSON; JAMES E. POPE; CHARLENE T. DRIGGERS;
SHEILA ANNE MARTIN; ROBERT M. CLEMENTS, JR.;
IRONWORKERS LOCAL 800; ELECTRICAL WORKERS
LOCAL 916; PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 359; CARPENTERS
LOCAL 2151; JOHN B. MURRAY, SR.,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee,
NORMAN R. KNIGHT, III,
Intervenor.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-92-184-2-18)
Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 28, 1996
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Biondo, Danie O. Gillespie, James Shaw, Haskell R.
Brown, Jr., Appellants Pro Se. Margaret Beane Seymour, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court's order granting
summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. The Appellants
claimed that the Appellee violated the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 522a
(1988), by denying them access to unofficial personnel files. Ac-
cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Biondo
v. Department of the Navy, No. CA-92-184-2-18 (D.S.C. Aug. 9,
1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
3