Martin v. Heckett

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6255 HENRY W. MARTIN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LYNN HECKETT, Doctor; LAWRENCE J. MINETTE, Doctor; BARNWELL MEYER, III, Doctor; JEFFREY MCKEE, Doctor; GENE DIXON, Doctor; ROBERT S. HANSEN, Ph.D.; KARL V. DOSKOCH, Doctor; HERBERT D. SMITH, Doctor; JOSE CHAVEZ, Doctor; DOCTOR GALVARINO; DOCTOR CHAMBERS, Doctor; O. W. WILLIAM, Doctor; V. T. SMITH, Doctor; WILLIAM S. HALL, MD, Psychiatric Institute; JOHN T. GENTRY, Judge; FRANK EPPS, Judge; FRANKIE P. MCGOWAN, Judge; VICTOR PYLE, JR., Judge; GERALD SMOAK, Judge, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-2310-6-OAK) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry W. Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying re- lief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Martin v. Heckett, No. CA-95-2310-6-0AK (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3