UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6964
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
STANLEY MACK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-90-18-3)
Submitted: November 30, 1995 Decided: June 11, 1996
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, WILKINS, Circuit Judge, and
PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Mack, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Stanley Melvin Mack appeals from a district court order deny-
ing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We affirm.
Mack filed this motion alleging that, during sentencing, the
district court relied on materially false information regarding a
prior conviction of possession of burglary tools. First, Mack
failed to show that he preserved this claim by timely objection.
See United States v. Bowman, 926 F.2d 380, 382 (4th Cir. 1991).
Second, Mack failed to shoulder his burden of revealing falsity in
the challenged information. United States v. Rachels, 820 F.2d 325,
327-28 (9th Cir. 1987). Mack's evidence in support of his claim
consisted of evidence that related charges were nolle prossed and
his statement that he was not convicted of any charges stemming
from the underlying acts. We find this insufficient in the face of
the record, which reveals the burglary-tool conviction. Therefore,
we affirm the district court order.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2