UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1966
BARBARA HOFFMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL HOFFMAN; JOSEPH ROUSE; STATE OF
MARYLAND; JUDGE RICKS; JUDGE MULLINS; JUDGE
DRYDEN; JUDGE GOUDY; JUDGE GREENE, JR.; JUDGE
KELLER; ASSIGNMENT OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT,
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; KERRY ANDERSON; DAVID
BOWERS; GALE ANN BELUCCI; RICHARD BACHARACH,
M.D.; DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; GINGER
HOWARD; INGRID HOFFMAN; SUE HOUSER; PAM
ZIOLKOWKSI; BERNIE DIVVER; EASTERN DISTRICT
POLICE DEPARTMENT OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96-
1969-AMD)
Submitted: August 20, 1996 Decided: September 19, 1996
Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barbara Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988), as amended by Prison Liti-
gation Reform Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, her
claim that her civil rights were violated during divorce proceed-
ings. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason-
ing of the district court. Hoffman v. Hoffman, No. CA-96-1969-AMD
(D. Md. July 2, 1996). Appellant's motion to supplement the record
is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3