UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6287
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TROY DONYEL STANSBURY, a/k/a Tommy D. Rodriguez,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-
89-434-S, CA-96-36-S)
Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Michael Schad, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Harvey E.
Eisenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), as amended by
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Stansbury, Nos. CR-89-434-S; CA-96-36-S (D. Md. Feb. 16, 1996). We
deny Appellant's motion to transfer this case to a formal briefing
schedule and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court, including Appellant's informal brief, and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
United States v. Stansbury
Combined Opinion