Wiley v. Tegetoff

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6993 JOHN WILEY, a/k/a James Harris, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIEUTENANT TEGETOFF; LIEUTENANT MCKOY; LIEU- TENANT NASH; OFFICER CHISLEY; TONY FOREMAN, Lieutenant, Defendants - Appellees, and CORPORAL MOSBY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-95- 2647-CCB) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: November 1, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Wiley, Appellant Pro Se. Linda B. Thall, Senior Assistant County Attorney, David Eugene Stevenson, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the order granting partial summary judgment to five Defendants; dismissing the claim concerning the denial of pre-release transfer; denying Plaintiff's motion for summary judg- ment; allowing the claim of excessive use of force to proceed; and staying further action in this matter. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3