USCA11 Case: 22-14240 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 12/06/2023 Page: 1 of 4
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-14240
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STACY LEON BUTLER,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 6:02-cr-00017-HL-TQL-2
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-14240 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 12/06/2023 Page: 2 of 4
2 Opinion of the Court 22-14240
Before LAGOA, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Stacy Butler, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s
order granting in part the government’s motion to amend his res-
titution order to apply his recent settlement award from an unre-
lated civil case to his outstanding restitution obligation under 18
U.S.C. § 3664(n).
We review a district court’s disposition of an 18 U.S.C.
§ 3664(k) motion for an abuse of discretion. See United States v.
McClamma, 146 F. App’x 446, 448-49 & n.1 (11th Cir. 2005) (citing
United States v. Vanhorn, 399 F.3d 884, 886 (8th Cir. 2005)). We also
review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. United States
v. Bryant, 996 F.3d 1243, 1251 (11th Cir. 2021).
The relevant statutory scheme for the issuance and enforce-
ment of restitution orders is contained in 18 U.S.C. §§ 3572, 3613,
and 3664. The district court, not the government, is charged with
determining how a defendant is to pay restitution. See 18 U.S.C.
§ 3664(f)(2). Under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996
(“MVRA”), in each restitution order, “the court shall order restitu-
tion to each victim in the full amount of each victim’s losses as de-
termined by the court and without consideration of the economic
circumstances of the defendant.” Id. § 3664(f)(1)(A) (“Upon deter-
mination of the amount of restitution owed to each victim, the
court shall . . . specify in the restitution order the manner in which,
and the schedule according to which, the restitution is to be paid .
USCA11 Case: 22-14240 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 12/06/2023 Page: 3 of 4
22-14240 Opinion of the Court 3
. . .”). The court will look to the financial resources and other assets
of the defendant, the projected earnings and income of the defend-
ant, and any other financial obligations of the defendant. Id.
§ 3664(f)(2).
Under the MVRA, a district court may modify a final order
of restitution upon a showing of a material change in the defend-
ant’s circumstances. Id. § 3664(k). Either the government, the vic-
tim, or the defendant himself may notify the district court and At-
torney General of a material change in the defendant’s financial cir-
cumstances that might affect his ability to pay restitution. Id. The
Attorney General must then certify to the court that the victim
who is owed restitution was notified of the change in circum-
stances. Id. Upon receipt of the certification from the Attorney
General, the court may, on its own motion, or the motion of the
government, the victim, or the defendant, adjust the payment
schedule, or require immediate payment in full, as the interests of
justice require. Id. The MVRA further instructs that “[i]f a person
obligated to provide restitution, or pay a fine, receives substantial
resources from any source, including inheritance, settlement, or
other judgment, during a period of incarceration, such person shall
be required to apply the value of such resources to any restitution
or fine still owed.” Id. § 3664(n).
Under the plain language of 18 U.S.C. § 3664(n), Butler was
required to apply the amount obtained in settlement to his owed
restitution, and § 3664(k) permitted the district court to amend his
restitution order to allow as much. We therefore conclude that the
USCA11 Case: 22-14240 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 12/06/2023 Page: 4 of 4
4 Opinion of the Court 22-14240
district court did not abuse its discretion in amending Butler’s res-
titution order to apply his settlement award to his owed restitution
and affirm the district court’s order.
AFFIRMED.