UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6233
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM E. MATTINGLY,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 96-6807
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM E. MATTINGLY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CR-94-4-2, CA-95-1126-2)
Submitted: October 22, 1996 Decided: November 7, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
No. 96-6233 affirmed and No. 96-6807 dismissed by unpublished per
curiam opinion.
William E. Mattingly, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly D. Ambrose, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
In No. 96-6807, Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's
order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994),
amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Mattingly, Nos.
CR-94-4-2; CA-95-1126-2 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 25, 1996). In No. 96-6233,
we affirm the district court's denial of Appellant's Motion to Re-
form or Rectify the Plea Agreement. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
No. 96-6233 - AFFIRMED
No. 96-6807 - DISMISSED
3