Sado v. Marx

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2126 NEGUSSIE SADO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LELAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee, and RONALD MARX; EDMUND PETERS; TED LEWIS; CHRIS- TOPHER PICKWICK; LINDA HERFORD; WASHINGTON ADVENTIST HOSPITAL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 94-2959-PJM) Submitted: October 29, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996 Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Negussie Sado, Appellant Pro Se. R. Dennis Osterman, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appel- lee's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's suit filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sado v. Marx, No. CA-94-2959-PJM (D. Md. July 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3