UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1442
ADOL T. OWEN-WILLIAMS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH,
INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge;
Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-94-1287-PJM)
Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 2, 1996
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adol T. Owen-Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Pontone,
Margaret A. Jacobsen, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his
motion to modify an arbitration award and denying reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Owen-Williams v. Merrill Lynch, No. CA-94-
1287-PJM (D. Md. Dec. 8, 1995; Mar. 19, 1996). We deny Appellant's
motion to supplement the record to add documents not before the
district court and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2