United States v. Gist

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7883 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM GIST, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-370) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 20, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Gist, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo- tion for review of his sentence. Appellant sought to challenge his sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3742(a)(2) (West Supp. 1996); however, his challenge was not filed within the appeal period, so we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). Even if Appel- lant's motion were construed as a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion, the district court lacked jurisdiction because only the Government may move for a Rule 35(b) reduction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. DISMISSED 2