Dickey v. City of Hartsville

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1805 JAMES H. DICKEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CITY OF HARTSVILLE; MEMBERS OF THE HARTSVILLE CITY COUNCIL; WILLIE D. HERBERT, individually and in his official capacity as city building inspector; BUSINESS LICENSE INSPECTOR OF THE CITY OF HARTSVILLE; WILLIAM F. BURTON, JR., individually and in his official capacity as city manager of the City of Hartsville; MATT CANARRELLA, individually and as Mayor of the City of Hartsville, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-93-1117-3-23) Submitted: April 22, 1997 Decided: May 2, 1997 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James H. Dickey, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Wilson Buyck, Jr., L. Hunter Limbaugh, Robert Thomas King, WILLCOX, MCLEOD, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order and order on re- consideration denying relief in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dickey v. City of Hartsville, No. CA-93-1117-3-23 (D.S.C. May 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3