Armstrong v. Koury Corporation

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1163 ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KOURY CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee, and HOLIDAY INN, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-96-87-2) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 30, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan A. Berkelhammer, SMITH, HELMS, MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in a discrimination case. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Armstrong v. Koury Corp., No. CA-96-87-2 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 2, 1997). Additionally, we deny Appellant's motion to amend his complaint and Appellee's motion to strike. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3