Mixon v. Mixon

                            UNPUBLISHED

                   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 97-1203



JAMES P. MIXON, JR.,

                                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

          versus

CHERYL T. MIXON; RUTH N. MURPHY; FRED MURPHY,

                                           Defendants - Appellees.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-97-136-2, CA-97-137-2)


Submitted:   May 1, 1997                      Decided:   May 8, 1997


Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


James P. Mixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

     Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

complaints as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mixon v. Mixon, Nos.
CA-97-136-2; CA-97-137-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 4, 1997). We deny Appel-

lant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.




                                                          AFFIRMED




                                2