Dehoney v. Moore

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6466 MICHAEL F. DEHONEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL MOORE, SCDC Director; CHARLIE J. CEPAK, Warden; WILLIAM R. DAVIS, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1356-4-21BE) Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 7, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Eric Petersen, Larry C. Batson, Sr., William Ansel Collins, Jr., SOUTH CAROLINA DEPART- MENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dehoney v. Moore, No. CA-96-1356-4-21BE (D.S.C. Feb. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2