UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7053
FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SNIDER; LIEUTENANT
BOYERS,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 96-7096
FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JACK LEE, AWO,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 96-7180
FREDRICK LYNWOOD FOLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WAGNER; LIEUTENANT LYLES;
L. M. SAUNDERS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-96-222-R, CA-96-255-R, CA-96-378-R)
Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 9, 1997
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaints. We have reviewed
the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversi-
ble error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Foley v. Snider, No. CA-96-222-R (W.D. Va. June 25, 1996);
Foley v. Lee, No. CA-96-255-R (W.D. Va. July 1, 1996); Foley v.
Wagner, No. CA-96-378-R (W.D. Va. July 19, 1996). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3