Akbar v. Morris

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6688 KARIM ABDUL AKBAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SERGEANT MORRIS; OFFICER PRICE, Defendants - Appellees, and SERGEANT DREW; LIEUTENANT SUESS; GENE BARBER; C. B. COOKE; DARLENE WHITE; MRS. THOMPSON; MRS. DIXON, Nurse; CHARLES HILL; OFFICER TAYLOR; J. C. PINION; MS. BROWN; TALMADGE BARNETT; HAZEL KEITH; LYNN C. PHILLIPS; GARY T. DIXON; LARRY DAVIS; LIEUTENANT GRIMES; SERGEANT VANCE; SERGEANT BEALE, Correctional Officer; MS. MILBURNE; OFFICER GREENE; OFFICER KING; LIEUTENANT WATSON, Correctional Officer; OFFICER PLYBON; OFFICER REMBRANT; SERGEANT MONROE; SERGEANT JACKSON; SUPERINTENDENT FRENCH; LIEUTENANT MOORE; LIEUTENANT ASKEW, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-628-5-H) Submitted: September 9, 1997 Decided: September 24, 1997 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karim Abdul Akbar, Appellant Pro Se. William Dennis Worley, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Akbar v. Morris, No. CA-95- 628-5-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 22, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2