UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1825
MARTIN A. AMICK, Employee,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-96-528-2)
Submitted: November 18, 1997 Decided: November 26, 1997
Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martin A. Amick, Appellant Pro Se. Robin Elizabeth Shea, CONSTANGY,
BROOKS & SMITH, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defen-
dant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's
claims of retaliatory discharge and intentional infliction of
emotional distress. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Amick v. Asplundh
Tree Expert Co., No. CA-96-528-2 (M.D.N.C. May 30, 1997). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2