UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6952
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
OLUMIDE OLADIPO HASSAN, a/k/a Alex R. Shoga,
a/k/a Hassan A. Akintola, a/k/a Hassan
Gallexy, a/k/a Gallexy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, District Judge.
(CR-93-186-A, CA-96-614-AM)
Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 25, 1997
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Olumide Oladipo Hassan, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard James Apperson,
III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28
U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Hassan, Nos. CR-93-186-A; CA-96-614-AM
(E.D. Va. Apr. 30, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997
WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
United States v. Hassan
Combined Opinion