United States v. Hazel

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7064 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BOBBY HAZEL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-62-A, CA-97-633-AM) Submitted: November 12, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997 Before WIDENER, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobby Hazel, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hazel, Nos. CR-93-62-A; CA-97-633-AM (E.D. Va. July 14, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). Appellant's motion to withdraw his previous motion seeking a stay of the informal brief- ing order is granted. Appellant's two motions seeking a stay of the appellate proceedings or an enlargement of time are denied. We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2