UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2397
BETTY SAULTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT HUTCHINSON, in his individual and offi-
cial capacity; STAN CLARK, in his individual
and official capacity; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPART-
MENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-94-2345-3-OBD)
Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 6, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Betty Saulter, Appellant Pro Se. Vance J. Bettis, GIGNILLIAT,
SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Betty Saulter appeals a district court order adopting a mag-
istrate judge's report and recommendation to grant Respondents
summary judgment and dismiss her action filed pursuant to the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (1994),
and her racial discrimination claim. Because Saulter did not file
objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the
district court did not err in adopting the magistrate judge's
recommendation to dismiss her claims. See Wells v. Shriners Hosp.,
109 F.3d 198 (4th Cir. 1997); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d
91 (4th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the
district court. Saulter v. Hutchinson, No. CA-94-2345-3-OBD (D.S.C.
Sept. 3, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2