UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7220
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DANIEL THOMAS DEPEW,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
(CR-90-17, CA-97-541-AM)
Submitted: December 16, 1997 Decided: January 13, 1998
Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Thomas Depew, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability, deny Appellant's motion for a certificate of probable
cause to appeal, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Depew, No. CR-90-17; CA-97-541-AM
(E.D. Va. Apr. 15, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion to appoint
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2