Williams v. Moore

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7494 JOHN E. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and DAVID JOHN LEWIS; EDDIE COHEN; ALFRED D. LAMOUREAX; LEROY FRAZIER JONES; FREDDIE LEE MOUZONE; CHARLIE THOMAS; KHALID ABDULLAH; MICHAEL PELZER; LEVERN HENRY; HUSSEIN FNEICHE; LEROY WILLIAMS, Plaintiffs, versus MICHAEL MOORE; PARKER EVATT; WILLIAM D. CATOE; GEORGE MARTIN; RALPH S. BEARSLEY; THOMAS R. SMITH; SERGEANT PRITCHERD; SERGEANT ROACH, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-584-0-17BD, CA-96-2967-0-17BD) Submitted: January 30, 1998 Decided: February 18, 1998 Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Moore, No. CA- 96-584-0-17BD (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2