Johnson v. Angelone

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7619 KEVIN JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE, Director, VDOC; DONALD R. GUILLORY, Warden Chief, PCC; WARREN C. SMITH, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; JERRY KILGORE, Virginia Secretary of Public Safety; GEORGE ALLEN, Governor, Defendants - Appellees, and LARRY W. JARVIS, Assistant Warden Operations, PCC; MAGGIE WATKINS, Assistant Warden Pro- grams, PCC; EARL R. BARKSDALE, Chief of Secu- rity, PCC; A. JOHNSON, Prison Guard Sergeant, PCC; R. L. ALLEN, Prison Guard Lieutenant, PCC; D. L. ANDERSON, Prison Guard Sergeant, PCC; I. J. GILMORE, Prison Guard Captain, PCC; E. R. MOODY, Safety Officer, PCC; W. R. BEST, Prison Guard Sergeant, PCC; SGT. PIEROTTI, Prison Guard Sergeant, PCC; L. BOOKER, Prison Guard Sergeant, PCC; MICHAEL WILLIAMS, Prison Guard Sergeant, PCC; LARRY COLLINS, Adjustment Hearings Officer, PCC; H. SCOTT, Prison Guard, PCC; SHEARN, Prison Guard, PCC; PALMER, Prison Guard, PCC; J. H. STANTON, Prison Guard, PCC; A. STARKS, Prison Guard, PCC; C. BOSWELL, Prison Guard, PCC; S. BOYKIN, Prison Guard, PCC; FLOOD, Prison Guard, PCC; D. A. WHITE, Prison Guard, PCC; PHILLIP SELLARS, Prison Guard, PCC; R. GRANT, Prison Guard, PCC; K. O. WHITE, Prison Guard, PCC; BURLEIGH, Prison Guard, PCC; CINDY FONTANA, Licensed Practical Nurse, PCC; DONNA ANDERSON, Operations Offi- cer, PCC; CEASAR LEWIS, Assistant Warden, MCC; JERRY R. TOWNSEND, Chief of Security, LCC; W. P. ROGERS, Regional Director, VDOC, Defendants. No. 97-7636 KEVIN JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE, Director, VDOC; DONALD R. GUILLORY, Warden Chief, PCC; WARREN C. SMITH, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; JERRY KILGORE, Virginia Secretary of Public Safety; GEORGE ALLEN, Governor, Defendants - Appellees. and LARRY W. JARVIS, Assistant Warden Operations, PCC; MAGGIE WATKINS, Assistant Warden Pro- grams, PCC; EARL R. BARKSDALE, Chief of Secu- rity, PCC; A. JOHNSON, Prison Guard Sergeant, PCC; R. L. ALLEN, Prison Guard Lieutenant, PCC; D. L. ANDERSON, Prison Guard Sergeant, PCC; I. J. GILMORE, Prison Guard Captain, PCC; E. R. MOODY, Safety Officer, PCC; W. R. BEST, Prison Guard Sergeant, PCC; SGT. PIEROTTI, Prison Guard Sergeant, PCC; L. BOOKER, Prison Guard Sergeant, PCC; MICHAEL WILLIAMS, Prison Guard Sergeant, PCC; LARRY COLLINS, Adjustment Hearings Officer, PCC; H. SCOTT, Prison Guard, PCC; SHEARN, Prison Guard, PCC; PALMER, Prison 2 Guard, PCC; J. H. STANTON, Prison Guard, PCC; A. STARKS, Prison Guard, PCC; C. BOSWELL, Prison Guard, PCC; S. BOYKIN, Prison Guard, PCC; FLOOD, Prison Guard, PCC; D. A. WHITE, Prison Guard, PCC; PHILLIP SELLARS, Prison Guard, PCC; R. GRANT, Prison Guard, PCC; K. O. WHITE, Prison Guard, PCC; BURLEIGH, Prison Guard, PCC; CINDY FONTANA, Licensed Practical Nurse, PCC; DONNA ANDERSON, Operations Offi- cer, PCC; CEASAR LEWIS, Assistant Warden, MCC; JERRY R. TOWNSEND, Chief of Security, LCC; W. P. ROGERS, Regional Director, VDOC, Defendants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-96-1178-AM) Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 25, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Collin Jefferson Hite, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 3 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint, denying his post-judgment motion to amend, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Angelone, No. CA-96-1178-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, Oct. 8, and Nov. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 4